Sun readers say no to web snooping

The Home Secretary’s article in yesterday’s Sun newspaper prompted David Davis to rais a point of order in the House of Commons, asking:

“I raise this point of order with you in respect of your duty of defending the interests and rights of backbenchers and committees in this House. This morning in an interview with the Sun newspaper, the Home Secretary, who I see is on the Treasury Bench, said the following about the Communications Data Bill: 

“‘Criminals, terrorists and paedophiles will want MPs to vote against this bill. Victims of crime, police and the public will want them to vote for it. It’s a question of whose side you’re on.’ She also said: ‘Anybody who is against this bill is putting politics before people’s lives.’

“A Joint Committee of this House and the other House is meeting at present to pass comment on this Bill. Therefore, apart from traducing a large number of Members of this House, the Home Secretary is undermining the work of that Committee. Has she asked to come to the House to explain herself, and if not, what can you do to protect us, Mr Speaker?”

The article was straight out of the New Labour playbook for security policies, but it seems the public have grown tired of such tactics. Not least the Sun’s own readers.

At the time of writing there are 94 comments on the Sun article and here’s what readers think:

Positive / support the Bill: 6 comments

Negative / against the Bill: 71 comments

Off topic / unclear: 17 comments

We’re proud to be on the side of David Davis, Nick Clegg, countless MPs and the overwhelming majority of Sun readers in defending our privacy and civil liberties. No amount of scaremongering is going to change that.